Preprint: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing

rebecca
Thu, 14 Mar 2019 06:45:58 +0000
Open and replicable science

New preprint on open science and scholarly publication. Three of the authors are from IGDORE: Jon Tennant, Jo Havemann, and Paola Masuzzo. They want your feedback on the preprint!

Tennant, J. P., Crane, H., Crick, T., Davila, J., Enkhbayar, A., Havemann, J., Kramer, B., Martin, R., Masuzzo, P., Nobes, A., Rice, C., López, B. R., Ross-Hellauer, T., Sattler, S., Thacker, P., Vanholsbeeck, M. (2019). Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. PeerJ.

Abstract The changing world of scholarly communication and the emergence of ‘Open Science’ or ‘Open Research’ has brought to light a number of controversial and hotly-debated topics. Yet, evidence-based rational debate is regularly drowned out by misinformed or exaggerated rhetoric, which does not benefit the evolving system of scholarly communication. The aim of this article is to provide a baseline evidence framework for ten of the most contested topics, in order to help frame and move forward discussions, practices and policies. We address preprints and scooping, the practice of copyright transfer, the function of peer review, and the legitimacy of ‘global’ databases. The presented facts and data will be a powerful tool against misinformation across wider academic research, policy and practice, and may be used to inform changes within the rapidly evolving scholarly publishing system.

2 posts - 2 participants