As the science reform movement has gathered momentum to change research culture and behavior relating to openness, rigor, and reproducibility, so has the critical analysis of the reform efforts. This symposium includes five perspectives examining distinct aspects of the reform movement to illuminate and challenge underlying assumptions about the value and impact of changing practices, to identify potential unintended or counterproductive consequences, and to provide a meta perspective of metascience and open science. It’s meta, all the way up.
Access speaker slides at https://osf.io/qfgy5/.
04:42 - “Psychologists psychologizing scientific psychology: An epistemological reading of the replication crisis” | Ivan Flis, Catholic University of Croatia
26:01 - “The scientific and social implications of implementing Open Science policies and procedures” | Sabina Leonelli, Exeter Centre for the Study of the Life Sciences, University of Exeter
55:38 - “Metascience as a scientific social movement” | David Peterson, UCLA
David’s preprint on this has already been discussed on the forum: Metascience as a scientific social movement