Thank you for the efficient kick-off meeting on the white paper today. It was great to see so many of you being present.
You find the recording of the meeting on the link below:
Here are the slides I presented on the meeting:
We have set up a list of all email addresses, as we will send out most important information and invitations in email. Please enter your preferred email address if you would like to be notified:
I have pre-filled it with the contacts who registered to the event or showed interest. In case you have any remark or would like to volunteer to be responsible for any sections, please add.
Some of you have already contributed to the shared document. As discussed, the first week would be about having a solid list of sections and general content. You find the document here:
As discussed, this will be the preferred communication channel, please feel free to reply / comment in this topic.
Looking forward to working with you!
Andras
p.s. the links are meant for internal use, please do not share them with third party.
thanks for the information, and sorry I could not attend the initial call
I wanted to follow up on one of the questions asked (by Alexander I think), “what is the main difference in what we want to produce, compared to what already exists“
As someone new to thinking more broadly about open science, I’m not fully aware of the existing literature in this area, so it would be valuable to have more references describing (for example) what is the "previous” state of the art that we might begin our discussion on?
I see a few references already in the draft structure document, and I suspect ultimately the paper will have a good description of the current landscape along with references, but I would appreciate if people can suggest any specific work that kind of sets the starting point for what we want to do